Should Recycling Be Required by Law?

PRO MANDATORY RECYCLING * recycle is so beneficial for our planet that it should definitely be required. In an sublime world, every wiz would voluntarily recycle, but lets face it Thats never going to happen. It makes me so godforsaken when I watch students in my school throw their plastic peeing bottles in the trash force out when there is a cycle can right next to it * Nearly 70 cardinal tons of material argon kept away from landfills each year thanks to recycling, fit to the National Recycling Coalition. If we have just now 30 percent of the nation recycling, wed reduce greenhouse botch emissions as much as if we removed 25 million cars from the road Imagine how many greenhouse gas emissions we could get rid of if every unitary recycled. * Its so easy to recycle, and if to a greater extent people do it, then it becomes more(prenominal) cost-effective. Some people against mandatory recycling maintain that its costly, but recycling is a less expensive process if more p eople are involved.In fact, two years after New York urban center decided that mandatory recycling was a drain on the metropolis costing $40 million they discovered that a redesigned, more in force(p) recycling system could actually save the city $20 million New York City has now signed a 20-year recycling contract. * We train to get more cities and states on board with mandatory recycling. In admission to helping the environment, recycling programs help stimulate the economy by creating more jobs. The benefits of mandatory recycling far outweigh the drawbacks, and its up to you, CosmoGIRL eaders, to get your cities on board Write to your local official and let her or him retire how you feel approximately mandatory recycling. Your actions can make all the difference of opinion Laura Carusco, 18, New York City, NY ANTI MANDATORY RECYCLING * Mandatory recycling is one of the newest fads in the go green movement. But what you may non realize is that its in like manner one of the close to costly and wasteful activities to infiltrate America. * Contrary to what most people think, recycling does not save irreplaceable sources. Take a look at the current prices for everyday items, like paper.According to the concept of cede and demand, since the price is so cheap, there must be a orotund supply that backs it up. For example, a pack of notebook paper ranges from just 20 cents to 50 cents. If we were at risk of running out of trees, the price would be much higher. * Also, by using less of one resource, we are necessarily using more of others. Daniel K. benzoin, senior associate of the Property and Environment query Center, stated in a report that on average, curbside recycling is 35 to 55 percent more costly nationwide than conventional disposal. Benjamin goes on to say that in Seattle, where the council decided to make recycling mandatory, they are wasting resources by charging too much for trash pickup and not charging enough for recycling pickup. Al so, think about all of the extra contamination caused by the recycling pickup motortrucks Its like having a garbage truck come through twice a week instead of just once. * Its also a misconception that were running out of room in our landfills. at that place is enough room just in America to last us for years, and we can always add landfills.Another misconception is that our trash is harmful, but according to the environmental Protection Agency, a cancer-related death due to modern landfills only occurs about once every 50 years. Cancer causes over half a million deaths a year in the United States alone, so one cancer-related death every 50 years doesnt even compare. * Although voluntary recycling has its benefits, it is completely unnecessary and wasteful to make it mandatory. Aliza Sajjad, 18, Concord, CA